A lot has changed, page-14

Winston, I will happily answer your points.

1.You reguritate the same agenda day after day. You have made your points often enough for a stock you openly admit to not owning, and also have condemned the whole sector.

Winston, what other reason would you have for posting so continuously for a stock that has no relevance to you? You've made you point over and over and over again. IMO you simply are enjoyiong screwing with people emotions.

2. I am not the voice of reason and I also have contempt for those who push every opinion that does not put VRC in a bright light and refer to them as 'downramping". You only need to look at my signature to rationalise that.. I have called out numerous people on this thread for needless "upramping" if there is such a term.

I have traded this stock on quite a regualr basis. I hold and continue to in varying parcel lots. Are you trying to save me from myself? What is your agenda? I'm one of those mom and pop investors who scraps a little of the edge every time the share goes up enough to justify the brokerage.

3. You have as much right as anyone else on this forum. However, by your sheer number of posts regurgitating the same dogma, you open yourself up to speculation on what your agenda is.. People might begin to ask what your rationale is to continually bombard a thread that you have no vested interest in.

4. I think the 911, mv augsuta people have heard me call them out enough times.


5. I object to baseless ramping, too. Again, see my signature. I stood up for your right to say what you wanted when you first started posting in the VRC threads. If you don't believe my, do some research. I still do stand up for your right, but I am now starting to question your relentless repitition.

6. And finally, you do your research... You find where I have spcifically questioned your posts and you have avoided a retort. It's all there.

Now Winston, how about you tell us what your real agenda is if it isn't a clinical one.