16.6%, page-2

Gday Griffo,

I am sure we all know the answer to that one.

But what is to be understood from Mr Garratt's situation? To have acquired his significant shareholding, one must acknowledge the existance of a fair level of business savy on his part. But there has to be something holding him back from expressing his view of proceedings. Between a rock, and a hard place most certainly I would think. But why? If there is a bigger game about to play out, then he most certainly is in the know. Why else would he have to sit his situation out, if he was going to bail out he most surely would have done so by now?

What is he to do? Does he have to wait until he is told how his shareholding is to be deployed when the time comes?