Careful @pustayo,
AG is trying to baffle investors with bullsh!t. He still refuses to inform the public what reagents he is using, instead decides to tell people what he produces (fluorosilicic acid), which @fooca clearly pointed out in the links (well-done), is toxic and dangerous.
I thought LIT wanted to produce Lithium Carbonate?
“Lithium Australia has undertaken all Sileach pilot tests under the most stringent safety conditions and has monitored for HF and, as predicted by ANSTO, found that negligible quantities are produced during processing,” Griffin continued.
If you dont, make/use/add hydrofluoric acid to Sileach, why monitor if? By your own admission HF is present. AG, what is the fluoride reagent? And why do you expect there to be no HF when you add that to acidic media?
“Independent safety investigations have concluded that operating with hot sulphuric acid is a much greater hazard than the risk of HF in the Sileach process.”
Yet it appears you have both of these in Sileach...
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LPD
- Ann: Alvarroes Lepidolite Mine Ore Access Agreement
Ann: Alvarroes Lepidolite Mine Ore Access Agreement, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.17M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $2.618K | 1.308M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 3088505 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 73001401 | 59 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 3088505 | 0.002 |
119 | 251414343 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 54311386 | 57 |
0.004 | 31199881 | 38 |
0.005 | 13108401 | 11 |
0.006 | 6534226 | 11 |
0.007 | 801437 | 4 |
Last trade - 15.43pm 12/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LPD (ASX) Chart |