The word “Independent” contained within the headline was oversight in the drafting of the release. ..... These references were removed by LWP throughout the text, however the inclusion “Independent” in the headline was overlooked.
So they suggest they removed the term 'independent' throughout the body of the announcement but failed to recognise the first word in the announcement was Independent.
The final statement from the retraction.
LWP apologises for any confusion caused.
Seems the market has been confused for a long time:
- quantum leap
- unrelated party transactions
- JV
- family holdings
- continued customer interest
- revolutionary battery technology
- bailouts to companies going into administration