money flow rising, page-25

Jaded - LOL :) Sorry about the "Pseudo" jibe... but the message was a bit hidden among the language. But I figured it out.

Sorry to hear you got banned at IC - I haven't lurked over there for months now. Mainly here, SS, and TS.

Back on the topic of INL - I still think that they need to employ a really good PR company as spin doctors, to sell the concept to the market at large. The converted shareholders know all about INL - it's not these that are the problem. It's the great majority out there in d'Mum and Dad-land (sorry - couldn't resist at least ONE;)) that just don't "get it". I'm pretty bright, but I don't quite get it either. And the chart is reflecting the fact that there are a majority out there who also don't get it.

Intec need a good sales job done, but not to their potential customers - to the sharemarket. As a long-time follower of things computer-ish, I have seen countless great ideas and good technology fail because the concept just wasn't sold properly to the punters. But the stuff that was marketed right has done brilliantly - witness the iPod for example. A nice bit of gear, for sure, but in terms of sound quality, battery life and replaceability, lack of DRM, etc etc, it was nowhere near the best game in town. But it had the PR spin done extremely well.

That is what INL need to do for the sharemarket - sell the concept nicely wrapped up in simple terms that appeal to the shareholders' desire to make money. Then you'll see a trend reversal!

Just my 'umble opinion, as usual.