Ann: Notice received under section 249D of the Corporations Act, page-4

As I say I'm no expert but looks like someone who owns at least 5% of Lck has requested the company call a meeting to replace the executive chairman. That's about all I can glean at this stage but I can't see why we as the voting shareholders would in good concience replace Mr Peters .

I think to date the company including managers etc have done a great job and they company is now months away from flaring.

Given all freely available info I won't be voting to replace Mr Peters , seems nonsensical to me

Keen to hear wha t you all think - corporations act legislation is not my forte