I agree with you Nikec. It's definitely still a project, but a lot of wtf and clearly no thanks to the efforts of caretaker management. AISC is purely a function of production which is hampered at the moment. That number only helps when explaining their current cash position but not helpful in looking forward. That's why getting to 32kT is so important, and happy to see a strategy to get there (although I'm still totally incredulous about it).
Agree that their grades should improve but I think they mined all the 4% material (I may be wrong).
92% power usage was excellent. I was disappointed not to see more detail around the pond remediation. And I have a bunch of operational, design and cost questions around the monitor. It will surely have an impact on mining, so what does that look like now and what does it mean for projected ASIC? Are they just going to just gun the side of the pit? Is it the permanent solution or just something they plan to do to get out of the hole (mining jokes)? Impact on power? I would take comfort in seeing some design information here....
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TGS
- Ann: March 2017 Quarterly Activities Report
Ann: March 2017 Quarterly Activities Report, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 90 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TGS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online