I am back. So is SGH, page-1096

Tumble/Voost

Can you please provide of couple of links with all your comments this morning so we can check for accuracy?

Or have you just provided your opinions? If so please in future state they just are your opinions.

I have asked you a few questions below so we can get your take on those.

What is your sophisticated take on the comments (conflicts of interests) that Slater and Gordon apparently made in relation to the class action from Maurice Blackburn.

1. Do you think that conflicts of interests is an issue real or perceived (ie major competitor)?

https://www.lawsociety.com.au/commu...ationship/Solicitorsdutiestoclients/index.htm
Conflicts of interest

Your solicitor must not allow their own interests, or the interests of an associate, to conflict with those of a client. A solicitor generally cannot act for you if they have previously provided legal advice to a person you are in dispute with. If you believe that your solicitor may have a conflict you should raise this with them.

2. Do you think that if indeed Slater and Gordon bought Quindell through misrepresentation that this in any shape or form will weaken MBs CA against Slater and Gordon?

3. Do you think that estimated future discounted cash flows in any shape or form affects the current value of Slater and Gordon (or do you think that book value is the current value of Slater and Gordon)?

Thanks Tumble/Voost