I am not a lawyer, but you have made some claims here that include two companies and used their logos in a way which seems like you are stating facts. Nowhere in your video have you said that you are voicing an opinion only or using speculation and I have think you have gone well beyond the "fair use" stage. If I was P&G or OBJ I would be very unhappy about this video and would see it being removed on the grounds that it breaches their trademark.
Either YouTube will take this down soon, or you will be receiving a request that you take this down voluntarily.
Regardless of the legalities, I think the responsible thing to do would be to have a short statement at least at the start, plus something short at the bottom of the screen saying that this is speculation and you are not associated with the companies.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Commercial Evolution
Commercial Evolution, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable