For me I would prefer that this is kept as a last resort as I would get higher overall ownership from a 30% sell down of SDV. Note that this assumes lithium carbonate equivalents of:
MC 20kT/a
SDV 25kT/a
JB 20-25kT/a
A 30% sell down of SDV is only 7.5 kT/a (10%-12%) difference as opposed to an outright 25% cut in share value.
No doubt SDV will outlast MC so at some stage would then be looking to reassess options but until then, I would say the best option is to keep CRs minimum.
In consideration I would support a higher debt facility instead. I'm guessing that the preferences are a debt facility with a combination of prepayments and a sale down of some description will be strongly considered first. I would personally prefer leveraging MC income to increase the debt short term to get things going but that's just my opinion.
I am looking forward to seeing the researchers revise their targets again.
GLTA
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GXY
- Fortune teller
Fortune teller, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)