As i said mate the docos are dated - given you have read and listened to the Energy Quest reports, how does the current 2976 PJ and your estimate of 1500 PJ compare to current projects?
The 2976 PJ number has already taken into account the recovery of gas from coal, as stated in the PRMS statement.
What I was trying to convey was that each independent resource statement (JORC and PRMS), along with Eddison and StateOne have all widdled this thing down to bugger all.
I am unclear how you arrive at 1500 PJ, given MHA have arrived at double your estimate, all the while reducing the resources by around 50% - your 1500 PJ is around 25% of the total resource, and 1/2 of what the PRMS consultant has arrived at.
I was aiming to show how I think Tony could have made such a claim, do you believe it was an outrageous claim then?
LCK Price at posting:
12.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)