I am back. So is SGH, page-1375

No we have gone over that -it is not a fact - now if it was you would be able to present a reference to that fact?
There are no desperate short coverings happening - this is misinformation- so you should check the previous posts with regard to short covering - I will repeat for about the third time today - only a very low volume of shorts where covered- and keeping in mind that this data has a three day lag - it is not actually relevant today- hope you understand this point.
If indeed you did understand the low volume and realistic non existence of activity you would realise you may need to focus on other issues.
Best regards with any hysterical hand waving - make sure you do some research - make sure it is good -
Best regards with your learning curve.
I am a bit confused that you said you were going to ignore me - however you kept talking