for what its worth have gone with grk options
1 in this case being first is not best.banks etc far more likely to lend the money once someone is actually generating geo electricity in the country.- also can piggyback on the learning experience of the front runner poach staff who have done it etc.
2 technical expertise - not just the world class expert they have hired but probably open access to the worldsbiggest mining team for free.bhp have vested interest in making this work
3 upside -if they can make olympic dam work the logical amount of production is over 1 gig
.am i correct in saying this is about $100k/per hour of revenue.on a 20million market cap a 10 bagger would be dissappointing if it did work.
4 for the reason above i selected the oppies -if it doesnt work doesnt whatever you hold will be useful for lighting fires and not much more doesnt matter if they are oppies or shares.-if it does work oppies move from 5c to $1.00 whilst shares move from 10c to $1.10
5 only have 200k oppies so no big deal but think this maybe worth some serious speculative investment.
guesss the downside would be serious lack of liquidity
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GRK
- geothermal comparisons
geothermal comparisons, page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)