1. As the relationship is single sex, it is inherently unequal as men and women both have characteristics that the other sex do not have. The only way to have true equality is to have an equal number of men and women in a marriage, the issue of sperm bank vs surrogacy highlights this.
2. So you agree in a previous reply that it is beneficial that children have both male and female role models at home, but you want adopted children to be disadvantaged by not prioritising hetro couples.
3. I am not sure the majority of parents would agree with you.
4. This is not about adoption, it is the removal from the child the third party whose biological material was used on the child creation. What are the child's right in regard to being removed from one or more of its birth parents, for no other reason that the parents sexuality.
5. The aspect of reproductive rights and adoption are not 100% equal nationwide. You are correct that some activists in some states are pushing or have pushed for legislation to try and subvert the typical laws around marriage rights.
Yes that is right. You have already said that you think it is beneficial that both male and female role models are raising the child at home, so would that not also go under positive discrimination if hetero couples were prioritised?