Gay Abandonment of Equality, page-195

Your reason ??? is that the public should be informed . Well there's plenty of info out there and that isn't a reason btw .
Because the general public could make an assumption due to the continuous whinging of the SS groups, that they are severely disadvantaged with respect to equal rights of the rest of the community.

I myself wasn't aware of how much equality the SS's have with the rest of the community. I only took interest because of their continuous moaning and found out that we are being duped.

Have you an objection to the plebiscite pamphlet displaying the following or similar information to the public?

'The plebiscite should clearly state that the SS society have 99.9% - or on par with a de facto heterosexual couples - same rights as the rest of the community.

It should be worded along the following lines, "that certain groups of the community will be offended if the words(marriage, married, wedding etc) associated with heterosexual wedding be adopted for same sex union".
"Consideration should be taken into account that their their sexuality activities is not the norm in the majority of our community". That an alternative word would suffice that would represent their union.

The question is , How is ssm going to affect you directly or indirectly ? Pretty simple question . Seeing as you're clearly opposed to this you must have some pretty compelling reasons
My reason is aligned with the Church's objections - the only Sunday's sessions that I used to go too in my younger days, was the 10AM pub service. Now, I partake in the holly water at home.

You need to broaden your mind! Can't you recall some feminists, were offended by the use of honorifics such as Mrs and Miss etc. So words are important to many members of a community.

I can't understand why I need to reiterate the gist of my responses over and over.

My criteria for what constitutes equality, will continue to differ. You haven't given any compelling reasons why they should entitled to use it, except for "Another, I want, I want .... mob.

Marriage in my view is only a church driven historical custom that is not even respected anymore .
True, but many non-religious heterosexual still implement the churches tradition in their weddings ceremony.

I don't agree with how Alan Joyce is doing it as CEO of Qantas . Fine for him to do it as a private citizen but not as a CEO .
This's going to be the only point we agree on.

I still lost about a list. Can't recall ever discussing anything about a list.

I still reckon that you are putting suss info about yourself. I would expect a Mx or SS person to argue their case for so long and strongly.

Radicool Views