The extra $1K invested in KDR and not MZN, makes the profit $6K v's $4K a 50% out-performance not 25%.
How someone risk manages would also depends on whether they assessed the initial risk as KDR 50%: MZN 50% or 90%:10%. Some are still thinking it is 50%:50%, even after the trial and haven't sold out at 0.7c, given every opportunity to maximize their profits on KDR.
Now if the same people though the risk was still present and still have their hedge in place, then they probably shouldn't buy anymore KDR shares until the verdict is 100%. Anyone holding both KDR and MZN and claiming to have bought more KDR in the meantime would be diluting their hedge strategy if you know what I mean. Either that or they never truly believed in their hedge strategy in the first place.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- KDR
- Earl Grey Lithium Project
Earl Grey Lithium Project, page-70
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add KDR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, CEO
Anthony Noble
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online