Bla bla bla, comment on the post I just gave you. OPSM again provides you the same paragraph from the 9 May 2016 announcement and bolds something else for you.
The basic output is ~1.5% chemicals [in solution] and 98.5% water and simple reverse osmosis can bring that up to ~5.5% chemicals. In this form it can be applied to plants and have the same effect as the fulvic material as currently marketed. (Note the words have the same effect and the other bit in bold - we are not marketing so they are saying same effect). Again I repeat, ays the same effect.- it doesn't say it is fulvic or humic acid but has the same effect.
So are you saying GPP are frauds, the results are fraudulent and the growth in trials are fraudulent. If you are not questioning the results in the various Anns what do you think created that growth. I am clear in my head what the above quote means as it relates to the trials been done and the fact 20 tonne per day pilot plant can produce quite a lot of product. Come out with it or just go away - what in your opinion has led to the growth rates in the trials, come on I know you want to tell us your conspiracy theory here.
GPP Price at posting:
2.7¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
