I've been looking at this for while now and flagging it with the ASX........surprising it's been allowed to go on this long with revaluing related party investments in such a manner to inflate the NTA.
The original prospectus mandate said they wouldn't invest in unlisted investments specifically as well.
Won't be surprised if this ends up being a good case study to look at in hindsight!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- HML
- Ann: Response to ASX Query
Ann: Response to ASX Query, page-12
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)