What's interesting here is looking at historical profit upgrades. Use the FY16 full year upgrade as an example:
"For FY2016, we expect revenue to increase by approximately 10-15% and Gross Profit by approximately 10-20% over the previous corresponding period, depending on the performance up to 30 June 2016."
Now look at the actual:
FY16 figures:
Revenue: +21.5% (From 15m to 18.28m)
Gross Profit: +22% (From 3.18m to 3.89m)
And again for the FY17 1H upgrade:
"For the first half of FY2017 ending 31/12/2016, we expect revenue to increase by approximately 10-20% and Gross Profit by approximately 10-20% over the previous corresponding period, depending on the performance of the remaining period up to 31 December 2016"
And the actuals:
FY17 1H figures:
Revenue: +34% (using sales revenue only) (From 8.146m to 10.99m)
Gross Profit: +20.8% (From: 1.58m to 1.91m)
I could keep going, - but my point is that when they upgrade, it always seems conservative...
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- HIT
- Ann: HIT Performance Guidance FY2017
Ann: HIT Performance Guidance FY2017, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add HIT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$2.07 |
Change
-0.050(2.36%) |
Mkt cap ! $87.56M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$2.13 | $2.13 | $2.07 | $7.759K | 3.695K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | $2.01 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$2.10 | 4500 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | 2.010 |
1 | 20000 | 2.000 |
1 | 269 | 1.990 |
1 | 5000 | 1.970 |
2 | 5258 | 1.950 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.100 | 4500 | 1 |
2.120 | 5910 | 1 |
2.150 | 3500 | 1 |
2.180 | 2444 | 1 |
2.200 | 14847 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 05/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
HIT (ASX) Chart |