Boeing say there is no difference: page 10
http://www.trbav030.org/pdf2006/265_Dagget.pdf
This is because the carbon content of a hydrocarbon fuel is the determinant of the calorific value. The more carbon, the denser it is and the higher the energy. So a plane requires less volume of a denser fuel, but the same weight. I suppose theoretically conventional jet fuel should be slightly more efficient overall as it needs smaller tanks, but as the fuel is stored in the wings it makes no difference.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LNC
- when is the meeting
when is the meeting, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)