It was done on number of heads as against mass and you get different answers on which one you choose. Using heads, and lets take the average growth of 5 and 35 litres per hectare data (3 +3.3)/2 = 3.15 it is (3.15/0.8) * 100 - 100 = 2.94%. Taking just 5l it is 3/0.8 *100 - 100 = 275%, at 35 litres per hectare is 3.3/0.8*100 - 100 = 312%.
Now if did it by dry mass would get increased mass ranging from 100% (5 litres per hectare) to 167% (30 litres per hectare). This was the first confusion for me in the Ann btw as to why results were reported on number of heads instead of dry mass. Hence my comment, in part, in previous post I don't expect 300% growth rates in the field. As I said the PFS should explain the project economics better IMO.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GNM
- Cannabis & OHD
Cannabis & OHD, page-149
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GNM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.319M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 150515 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.5¢ | 139048 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 150515 | 0.014 |
7 | 781377 | 0.013 |
3 | 732302 | 0.012 |
5 | 674925 | 0.011 |
6 | 1569995 | 0.010 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.015 | 139048 | 1 |
0.016 | 60303 | 3 |
0.017 | 227673 | 2 |
0.018 | 416660 | 3 |
0.020 | 356995 | 3 |
Last trade - 10.04am 09/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
GNM (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
AHK
ARK MINES LIMITED
Ben Emery, Executive Director
Ben Emery
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online