I think the conclusion is that the jury is still out, which lends weight to the argument that its better to be cautious (try and reduce g/h gases) than wait and do nothing I suppose. The GGWS doco and expert panel response afterwards told me of vested interest on both sides, scepticism of scepticism etc.etc
Did anyone else think that David Karoly (School of Earth Sciences) on the panel looked and acted like Ricky Gervais' agent on TV Extras?
