...by the Labor Party that discretionary trusts are being used to avoid tax.
Trusts MUST have a primary purpose other than a that of reducing tax. If they have NO other primary PURPOSE but reduce taxes, then that trust no longer is a tax avoidance vehicle , it is a tax evasion vehicle.
Isn't this the law?
If there isn't a tax ruling on this, then there is meant to be!
Can anyone cite the case? 'not capable of explanation by reference to ordinary business or family dealing ' The Doctors' Cases? COT v Gulland, Pincus V FCT , Watson V FCT
With this precedent, why does Shorten need to mouth his smarmy mouth off?
"We need a new law?" Says he...
"But there is already a perfectly good one in place sir!"
"Yes, but what else then shall I prattle on about in front of the TV about?" Says dear flustered Shorten.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- The Trust Debate... An ALP Win
The Trust Debate... An ALP Win, page-46
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)