Have to be positive. The fundamentals have NOT changed - the stakes are so extremely high here, that the results must be completely bullet proof, transparent, and have an extreme degree of due diligence, that also needs to be scrutinized. Some of the 'simplistic' negative posts seen today really show up poster's ignorance of how things are done when playing in at this top level of technical space.
Can g'tee that if the results are consistent with what has already gone...and why not? There will always be someone with a vested interest that will wish to pick them apart, looking for technicalities to back up their theory.
So the extra time, i suspect is needed to ensure that everything is triple checked, including no doubt the secondary (confirmation) diagnosese... So very happy that this process is takinng place
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RAP
- Ann: Voluntary Suspension
Ann: Voluntary Suspension, page-103
Currently unlisted. Proposed listing date: 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 #
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 369 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)