Look I'm sorry if I have raised unpopular point but I just posted that now censored link because it was from a smart guy. I just did the numbers on NMDD0092 myself and if you generously assume all of the missing intervals are 0.45g/t - ie just below the stated 0.5g/t cut off and do a length weighted intersection from the top to the bottom of the intersection ie 162m to 596m you get 434m @1.34g/t NOT 3.1g/t.
I do these table all the time and the way it is stated is misleading and in basically just plain WRONG
Sorry if that seem unpopular - I will not labour the point
CDV Price at posting:
64.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held