Share
275 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 8
clock Created with Sketch.
05/09/17
12:22
Share
Originally posted by blister
↑
Are you sure, becareful what you wish for.... there are a number of issues yet to be covered by the SAS army of blind followers. They have still yet to tackle the issue of licence fees for 200 nanos and the revenue is still way off the carry cost of the infrastructure. This then leads to the obvious next question as to how much bandwidth can a nano actually handle and i didn't see a mention of latency on the data transactions, which is a big factor.
There also seems to be some confusion from outsiders and insiders, I read an article that raved about SAS as it was going to handle all the low data transactions.. stuff like credit card transactions and machine to machine links. But the other side was talking about phone calls and sms. It appears the later is correct however if the answer is both we come full circle back to the bandwidth question.
Overwhelmingly, the concern is that if SAS manages to generate a market in the 3rd world for telecommunications, assuming that telecommunications is the only hinderance to the development of these economies, then about .04 of a second later they'll run fiber cables and the satellite game is up.
Expand
It is so obvious you haven't done any real research into SAS. Many of these issues of latency, bandwidth are such old news.
Seriously mate you sound ridiculous.