Surandy, we don't know the basis for MIN declaring an Event of Default?
it could have been something like the event of Suspension of EGO on the ASX.
They assuredly would have had a "Material Adverse Change" clause in the Loan doc.
those clauses cover just about anything.
Also, the fact that EGO declared the RG-1 well non-producing alone would have triggered the Default.
So yep, could have been non payment of interest, but could have been plenty of other reasons to declare default.
Harry - the Receivers at this stage appear to be acting only over the Secured Assets, which appear to be just the RG assets.
MIN's Receivers will just secure and operate the RG assets, incl the Alcoa contract. They will literally lockup the RG field and plant.
If that is just MIN's security, then the rest of EGO can continue on, until it deems it may become Insolvent.
I would fully expect to see at least some of directors jump ship now.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EGO
- Ann: Receivers and managers appointed to certain assets of Empire
Ann: Receivers and managers appointed to certain assets of Empire, page-23
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add EGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online