Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Prelude to war?, page-40

First 40 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
slippin

8,300 Posts.

1225

16/09/17

03:27

Post #: 27260034
Share

Originally posted by pints ↑

Unfortunately, as I see it, there is too much at stake to attack NK.

Seoul could suffer millions of deaths; Japan could also suffer huge losses and anyone in the region would be severely affected. China would face a massive onslaught of refo's crossing their border. And that would all be possible under a conventional weapons war scenario.

NK doesn't need a missile to deliver nukes. Bung 'em on a plane, fly over to Seoul on a suicide mission and even if the plane was shot down 10kms from Seoul, kaboom, end of population of Seoul. Also, fall out would probably kill many in NK. But that would bother Kim as he only thinks of him and his dynasty.

I think, as much as I would like to take out Kim and his generals in a pre-emptive strike, the risks associated are too great.

China is the great hope that a sensible negotiated agreement can be consummated between the West and the idiot Kim.

Expand

The problem we now have is even if China were to negotiate with NK, would Kim give up his nuclear weapons? No, he wouldn't because USA could reneg on the deal.

Kim should have been terminated years ago but unfortunately we've had weak gutted Presidents like Obama and Clinton.

Time to nuke NK. Sooner or later.
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

SYR

Syrah jumps as Mozambique force majeure lifted

Wednesday's HotCopper trends: Race RC220 doses, West Mits Qala study | July 23

Japan tariff deal inked at 15% – as long as US gets half a trillion of investment

TLX

Telix sinks as US regulator SEC issues subpoena over claims

First 40 Last