i voted no, page-169

  1. 12,916 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 595
    I can quite reasonably see that an argument can be made that if two homos can marry because they love each other then another person can equally argue that they love their dog and their dog loves them. The dog will demonstrate love all day every day. So what is the difference?... love is love. We already have people that leave their estates to their pets now.

    I can see that it can be argued that three or four people can all love each other and want to be married. After all "love is love" and isn't that the only requirement.?

    The same can be said for pedophilia. Perhaps you can find a study to suggest that if you are horrified by that you secretly desire it.?

    I believe our ancestors were smart enough to understand these things and why boundaries were set in the first place.

    Any law can be changed including ones that set age limits, species limits, gender limits.

    It is a slippery slope..... no doubt.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.