Author of "warming not as bad as thought" paper fires back at denialists, page-2

Amongst the many quotes that your mate Miles Allens  and co said that HAS given weight to the claim of crap models is what he stated to THE TIMES

“We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models. We haven’t seen that in the observations.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/enviro...ience-myles-allen-michael-grubb-a7954496.html


Or from the times the Environmental editor states

The study, published in the journal Nature Geoscience, makes clear that rapid reductions in emissions will still be required but suggests that the world has more time to make the changes.


I think the recent headlines and captions are pretty accurate.  The models are shite.  Accept it and stop dancing around the edges sparra.  It is no biggie to concede

FYI,  the current modelling from the paper Allen et al paper NOW uses models labelled "RCP2.6 - 2017"  Yep the new 2017 version