TDPS is made up of both live and pre-recorded interviews, clips from television and radio programs related to politics and current events, segments with correspondents on the street and in public, and other specially produced segments. Pakman has said that the show is a "cross between Howard Stern, Rush Limbaugh, and Rachel Maddow."[10]
Just out of curiosity, does David Packman have any analysis on what occurred in regards to the event presented. Does his show cover events from that angle, I have not been able to find any information myself. Have you been able to? I thought I might add at this point have you ever noticed a narrative positive or negative against politicians ever? Well I have noticed, especially leading up to the election between the U.S election, speaking to many others around me it did have effects on their perception of reality. So if you present that you can be programmed by what information you consume then I agree 100%, that is why it is up to us to consume all information and critically analyse it before believing anything just thrown our way.
Thank-you for presenting your thoughts on this event, the more we all communicate openly the more we can all figure out what occurred, what is going to occur and together we can all make a change. By voting with our dollars and getting involved peacefully and politically we have the numbers, do not forget that when it is time to vote etc.
Time will tell what did occur and only facts and evidence will be sufficient in determine what did occur, can we as a species ever figure out what happened. The question is do we have the time energy and will to ask such questions, or do we just mindlessly bicker over opinions and our own thoughts.
Media Give Trump Most Negative Presidential Coverage in 25 Years Only 5 percent of news reports are positive, according to Pew Research Center
Claims by President Donald Trump that media organizations primarily report negatively on him were proven true by new research by Pew Research Center.
An analysis of 3,000 stories during the first 100 days of his presidency across 24 different media organizations found that reporting on Trump has been the most negative compared to other presidents over the past 25 years.
The research shows that only 5 percent of media reporting during the period was positive. Sixty-two percent of the stories were negative, and 33 percent were neither positive nor negative.
By comparison, coverage of President Barack Obama during the same time period was 42 percent positive, and 20 percent negative. For President George W. Bush the number was 22 percent positive, and 28 percent negative. And for President Bill Clinton it was 27 percent positive, and 28 percent negative.
The study also revealed that most media coverage of Trump focused on his character traits rather than policy.
Only 31 percent of all stories published on Trump focused on policy issues, compared to 50 percent for Obama, 65 percent for Bush, and 58 percent for Clinton.
“The evaluations of President Trump were far more negative and less positive than those of his predecessors,” wrote the Pew Research Center. Dominating Topics
Five topics dominated the news coverage during the time period evaluated by the Pew Research Center, Jan. 21-April 30, making up two-thirds of all media coverage.
The main topic covered centered around President Trump’s political skills (17 percent), followed by coverage on immigration, a key policy issue of Trump (14 percent), presidential appointments and nominations (13 percent), U.S.-Russia relations (13 percent), and health care (9 percent).
Since Trump won the presidency in November, much of the media coverage has sought to question the legitimacy of his presidency and create divisions in society. Most media organizations reported extensively on the allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.
However, many of the stories relied heavily on anonymous sources from within the intelligence community, resulting in frequent erroneous reporting.
Speaking under oath before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on June 8, former FBI Director James Comey discredited a Feb. 15 front page story in The New York Times, which claimed that members of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign “had repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election.”
At the time, The Epoch Times noted many flaws in the report, which The New York Times used to push a narrative of collusion.
At the hearing, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) pressed Comey further on the piece from The New York Times, asking “would it be fair to characterize that story as almost entirely wrong,” to which Comey replied, “Yes.”
Comey went on to discredit other media reports, which have frequently cited unnamed intelligence and government sources to push their narrative that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the election.
“All of you know this. Maybe the American people don’t,” Comey said, addressing the Senate committee. He said when it comes to reporters writing stories about classified information, “the people talking about it often don’t really know what’s going on.”
He said there have been many stories about the Russia investigations “that are dead wrong.” Divisions
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson responded to a story published by NBC News earlier this week which had claimed Tillerson had considered resigning.
Tillerson told reporters at an unscheduled press briefing that the story was false and that he had never considered resigning. He also accused media organizations of trying to divide people.
“This is what I don’t understand about Washington. I’m not from this place. But the places I come from we don’t deal with that kind of petty nonsense. It is intended to do nothing but to divide people. I’m just not going to be part of this effort to divide this administration,” Tillerson said.
President Trump also called out NBC News for the article writing on Twitter that “Rex Tillerson never threatened to resign. This is Fake News put out by @NBCNews.”
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said on Thursday that with the freedoms of the First Amendment also comes responsibilities.
“You have a responsibility to tell the truth, to be accurate,” Sanders told reporters in response to a question about the issue.
“We’ve seen recent information that says that only 5 percent of media coverage has been positive about this President and this administration, while at the same time you have the stock market and economic confidence at an all-time high.”
“Frankly, those are the issues most Americans care about—not a lot of the things that you cover, not a lot of the petty palace intrigue that you spend your time on. I think that we need to move towards a certainly more fair, more accurate, and, frankly, a more responsible news media for the American people,” she said.
