Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Why I voted NO, page-195

First 195 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
vertigo

11,416 Posts.

350

15/10/17

14:54

Post #: 27914988
Share

Originally posted by bourse ↑

Men have the right to reduce the size of their penis - women don't.
So what?
Your argument has NO value its meaningless.

Women were stopped from being police, firemen, etc.
Society has moved beyond restricting HUMAN rights on the basis of biology.

Are you participating here via a time machine, while sitting in Dickensian England?

Since when was marriage, only for couples, identical in every way?
Couples are divided now - by religion, ethnicity etc etc - BUT still have the right to marriage equality.
Why not SSC.

Expand

It is not meaningless, biology is not meaningless, as I have pointed out in law distinctions made on that basis.

Are heterosexual and homosexual unions identical in every conceivable way, or are their basic biological truths that are the basis for their definition difference?

Last edited by vertigo: 15/10/17
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

SER

How flooding did Strategic Energy Resources a favour: Four holes down in 'redesigned' gold & copper campaign

CC9

Chariot locks in high-potential drill target at Black Mountain, one of the USA's largest lithium landholdings

Week 34 Wrap: HotCopper's top watched; Oz banks cut saver interest; Kamala’s 28% corporate tax; AI’s back

The Rising Tide: How institutional adoption is shaping the future of crypto

JAV

Javelin increases the resource of Coogee in WA by 158%

There are more pages in this discussion • 79 more messages in this thread...

First 195 Last

SPONSORED BY