Range will still be there and with ''no case to answer'',option holders will be told that they were motivated by greed. and refused to be reasonable when the charts told the story . They will be told that they continued to clutch at straws ,interpreting everything said by the company as positive ,deaf to the ''possibly'' ''hopefully'' ''subject to'' type answers. pure and simple
Then theres the massive bearing the DOW sp meltdowns that have fed thru to the high risk end of the market and the TFG'S OIL LAW and GEDI'S supposed 10 mil bribe from the Indonesians and Kuwaitis
How do you factor these things into your argument ..coz bet ya last dollar the company's lawyers will amplify ALL of the above.
I speak from experience having hired a QC for 14 months on a different case to the asic one that I mentioned....
IMF will only give it a cursory look till they realise just what rrso is/was in the first place..
I took a $350,000 loss on rrso and I moved on and bought imi which has doubled in the time I've watched the oppies head further south...
You have to take some responsibility for your losses
Otherwise it makes reasonable sense to say that if you were gonna make big on the oppies , you were going to give the company a big thank you slice
FINALLY this talk of class action is only going to divide us all on the forum rrs vs rrso
RRSO = hell bent on destroying the company by trying to get money that the co doen't have
RRS HOLDERS= trying to conserve what they have after making a reasonable decision to stay away from the super risky options
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RRS
- legal action is a waste of time
legal action is a waste of time, page-19
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)