No way CTN Board and authorities could just sit there if management of CTN portfolio went back to CGA Given CGA has now ADMITTED it can't deliver a good Micro return for CTN! And No way NAOS ( whichever ? ) purchase can have been based on a non refundable deposit -- Why would NAOS or its funds pay $2m w/o that protection, and run any risk of a new IMA getting rejected. Yet CGA announcement only refers to conditions on the balance of the $6m, and the later year payments - more hot air?
DYOR
Is this the most ridiculous sentence ever written?, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add APL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.214M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 223000 | 11.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0¢ | 20863 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.30pm 17/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| APL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable