not the best outcome 4 the oppie holders , page-10

Bartm, it is unethical for one to be a larger holder and hence demand superiority over others in terms of one's own "social construction of commercial reality".

IMHO, it is offensive for too many lurkers here not to rebut with nothing else that effervesces seniority which seperates the reason.

Perhaps some are unaware of expertise that is never a given, but which increases at an increasing rate.

I remember the nights wracked with insomnia too. LOL

Rather childish IMO. Putting forward the possibilities of the business plan by the company was IMO always going to eventuate by one and (another) and perhaps, was even *underlined* by the unfortunate timing of the alternative listing in London.

Of course I, and so many others, had a valid reason to critique Range's *ability* to fathom the consequence of having an ongoing changing registry but I would never epitomise the greed and self serving comments of in particular one person here.

There is not one citizen that would not salute another for having shaken hands with every PM one could think of, but really...I would never want to be a GG either.

This is why the informed are almost ostracised from participating IMHO.

I can be outspoken but I am sure others just shake their heads. LOL