Thats a fair question to ask. What vic has found is their roadside testing has been a failure, hense the lack of positive news one would expect combined with the govt rolling out a advertising campaign similar to drink driving campaigns. Western Australia was to begin road side testing last Friday but has indefinitely postponed its start date.
The reason is THC accounts for something like 60 to 80% of all traffic accidents that are drug related. In vic there was a study commissioned by the Govt which found roughly 12-14% of population over 17 years smoked marijuana.
However according to the results of the road side testing only 2.5% of the population smoked marijuana. Why is this so? The device used by the Vic police can only detected THC used from a few days to a week prior which is pointless since its like finding out you where over the limit a week ago but no way of knowing if you are presently to drunk to drive.
This in a nut shell is what separates Oraline IV to every other device in the would. Oraline IV can detect 4ng/mL of THC which is less than the cut of point established by SAMHSA, which is the US govt dept that sets all drug testing benchmarks in the USA. Oraline IV can detect marijuana (THC) almost immediately upon use while the closest device can only detect a minimum of between 40-100ng/mL (pointless for THC)
Marijuana accounts for more than 60% of all drug related problems associated with work site, roadside, student in other words the complete "Drug War"
HGR Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
