Interesting analogy with Elon Musk. The difference i would suggest seems to be he is at the core of all the developments and technology at Tesla and always has been. Steph is relatively new to pyc and doesnt have a biotech background so as such is learning what we do and how to present it. I would assume though that any in depth scientific questions would have to be handed on to others. Not necceserily an issue just an observation.
One thing i have wondered for some time now is who is actually driving the science. I always had the impression paul Watts was the scientific guru who had developed this whole library concept then steered us into the fpp and imyc areas. Now i wonder was that him, or is there another unnamed scientist making these breakthroughs, or is it just the "team" together making these advances. Particularly, was Mr Watts or someone else directly responsible for the fpp and endosomal escape trap tech?? Might be the next question to the company for me. I always thought Richard and Paul were driving the science but now they seem to have moved on. Is that why we now dropped imyc again?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)