I have clearly pointed out that it appears to be concurrently at both low points in the graph and cited sources to support this. You are implying it is at the top, but providing zero evidence to back this up.
The other stock clearly has much more lithium than is useful and the valuations being thrown around on there are quite frankly ridiculous taking this into account. It isn't exactly in it's early days of proving a resource like you say, but it still needs to prove feasibility, we don't need to prove feasibility, just how feasible it actually is. Not to mention the lithium our drilling keeps intersecting. I don't like to refer to other stocks, but feel it is related to you posting that here. I'm all for discussion though, so thanks for helping me point out the upside with investing in BGS.
I fail to see how BGS is looking 'on the toppy side' based on your reasoning
BGS Price at posting:
59.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
