Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Court Upholds $135K Fine For Bakers Who Refused To Bake Gay Cake, page-53

First 53 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Justis

63,691 Posts.

731

31/12/17

15:06

Post #: 29959289
Share

Originally posted by Trash2Treasure ↑

Yes anti discrimination laws bothered me before. It's all a dictatorial approach to private interactions. Let customers decide. Only a monopoly should be forced to service all equally.

And there are some very obvious ways to determine the cake is for a homosexual marriage.

If the to be married ever enter the store together.
If the names of the couple are ever requested.
If one uses the term husband or wife to refer to another and that term would be to describe them.

If this was none of the bakers business, the baker would never be approached as there would be no need to communicate with them.

The baker as an individual and business should be able to say no for any pathetic reason. Afterwards a business can face a customer backlash and stores that serve what or whom another refused can promote their service.

Expand

So you would be happy for a shop to have signs like the following
We don't serve Blacks
We don't serve Asians
We don't serve Disable people
We don't serve Hetrosexuals
We don't serve Jews

Get over it
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: Iron awe keeps the XJO tracking along

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 019 – Dreaming of the 9,000s

TMG

Trigg brings famed Finnish metals refiner – and its tech – onboard to bolster antimony processing

TLX

Telix sinks as US regulator SEC issues subpoena over claims

Japan tariff deal inked at 15% – as long as US gets half a trillion of investment

First 53 Last