OH Deary, you have still not got it, so here is what would probably be No 5 attempt and I assume another 5 or more will be required;
Wotsup's post to DBT after the "said" claim by DBT that it was wotsup's fault for "their" strange behavior on the Transfiguration subject;
Seriously, do you think if you can confuse the matter and point the finger at wotsup, that will make you like right = Your in an absolute deceptive dream world.
The deflection you attempted and still attempting is following, and there is absolutely NO WAY your can put the finger, blame wotsup or his post for your stupidity and crap on this transfiguration subject.
The only reason I keep on about this is because your TOTALLY distorting truth and bull-dusting why it happened.
Stand up for your own UN-EXPLAINABLE ????? on this matter.
DBT'S reply to wotsup - That's pathetic, considering that I have acknowledged my error and explained why it happened, ie, your posts are messy and most of it a waste of precious time to decipher, garbled reasoning, rambling, babbling, colours, bells and whistles. So, as I've already said several times, I made an error, an error as a result of skimming and the fact that there is nothing prior to Mark 9:1 that helps you in any way....hence my error. False blame game played by DBT as the following "evidence" CLEARLY shows;
Wotsup’s two liner post following, produced very early in the debate, very easy to understand, short two lines and straight to the point, totally nullifying the said claim above.
Post - ''Heads up - the transfiguration - not once have I ever tried to associate this with Mark 9:1 or the "other" subject you keep trying to invade with = Not once.''
DBT's reply - with sad excuses - Your posts being so long and rambling and difficult to read, not to mention time constraints - I really don't want to spend all of my time on HotCopper addressing your fallacies of equivocation - so I was just covering all bases,(There is your acknowledgement) all possibilities...which makes no difference to what you were attempting to do, or your failure at providing actual explanations. It makes no difference to your argument, or lack of one.
Acknowledgement – But then,,,,, in a flash and in the “same” reply/post, loses their marbles “again”.
However, you keep bringing up Mark 9:1 in the hope that the transfiguration is the promised return in power.
---------------
So right here in YOUR OWN post, you have acknowledged your mistake with FALSE excuses and THEN (same breath) ignored your own admitted mistake and words and insisted that I was STILL using the Transfiguration for my support and did this for many, many more of your post, until Coppo eventually came to the rescue, which you then still "tried" to conjure up excuses.
So this is what a number of our latest post are about of which you have been trying to side step and confuse, every which way but loose, no more no less.
So your key defense point for well over a month was DEFENSELESS = Zero.
So face up to and wear your OWN MESS and stop trying to unload it onto another = FACTS!
