one of a kind, page-13

Captain,

I did not imply that you were posting untruths deliberately. I was saying that you were posting untruths unwittingly by believing a cowboy company's advertising pitch and presenting it as fact before confirming its accuracy.

You ask "so then why the discrepancy found on this website?"

I think you'll find, once you've done the research, that the company is drawing a very, very long bow. That is, it is referring to 'tests' as FDA approved - NOT its 'device'. So, FDA approval for tests for various substances with urine devices etc is being 'borrowed' for its testing products. Clearly a fabrication aimed at maximising sales and expected to go unnoticed with naive purchasers.

You also ask: "I'm wondering if anyone can clear up whether FDA approval for oraline is a world first or just a USA first?"

Same thing. FDA decisions only relate to US- based companies. Producers in other countries may use FDA approval as a marketing tool because they know it has currency and credibility.