....and further; I can understand anybody not liking the deal we have right now and feel too much has been given away, although personally I think we were somewhat constrained due to the state of the company when the new board took over but that is a separate issue, what it is that I don't understand is why anybody would really want a Breeze controlled board back again???? No matter which way you look at it, it has to be a bad business decision. In fact I believe that if we had a "sponsor" to pay for our seismics and drilling etc sorted out ASAP after the first disaster - we may not have had to give so much away (and it was a disaster of epic proportions - drilled in the wrong place)?????!!!!!! That was when it would have been wise to resign Mr. Breeze; since that time it has been managed disgracefully - and expensively. To get where we are today has taken way too long and almost all of this has been done within the last few months not in the last 5 years or so, we had nothing after nothing apart from old news dressed up as new. Damned if this will continue as a lifestyle company, enough is enough. I want - no I demand that this company is existing & run to achieve it's objectives of creating wealth for it's shareholders not exist to create employment.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MMR
- Ann: Receipt of Notice of intent to remove Directors
Ann: Receipt of Notice of intent to remove Directors, page-6
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MMR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.236M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MMR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable