Share
13,167 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1275
clock Created with Sketch.
30/01/18
11:30
Share
Originally posted by Martin Gifford
↑
"Good to see GSW coming out of the ring fighting with PWC in their corner."
I don't think that's the case. Basically, GSW might be concerned that the market doesn't believe them, so they are getting PWC to present a presumably unbiased view. Disbelief from the market is a very negative sign.
What we'll see is some spin like, "Management have put in place more guidelines for future announcements so that these unfortunate misunderstandings don't happen again."
"Ha ha how fast are the non-holders to post here ...."
These attacks on non-holders should automatically lead to suspensions. We are here to discuss the company, not other posters. It's tiresome reading these valueless posts. It's just as easy to attack the holders by saying they are either naive newbies who will hold when the s/p falls or they are cunning traders who are just trying to bolster support so that they can sell at a higher price on open and buy back at a lower s/p to reduce their short-term losses. Or we could say that holders are trying to distract attention away from the reality of the company's current situation. Or we could say that holders are insecure and getting emotional rather than being objective about their finances. Etcetera. So all the imagining of motives in other posters is a valueless exercise because you'll never get to the truth unless someone confesses. It's also against HC TOU.
Expand
Nothing I said is against the HC TOU. All I said was is that it is funny how damned fast all these non-holders are to get their comments in on a stock they don't hold. Almost like they are twitching at the keyboard to post on GSW the moment any news comes to hand - more so than actual holders.
If you can't see the comedy in it and want to then immediately turn yourself into the HC police then I think you need to lighten up.