Miles so this is the example of my "racist" posting, is it???
"But its the muslims that have this penchant for big, bright explosions with lots of blood and carnage
Thats what has to be rooted out. And as you say lou, by them and in their midst!!!!"
To which you reply:
"The vast majority DO NOT have a penchant for big bright explosions
But because a minority do you class all of them the same or at the least approve of those with this mind set. You in saying it is in their midst also implies the gerenal muslim population not only knows who these radicals are but have some knowledge as to what they may or may not be planning
THAT IS RACIST
Catholics in Northern Ireland also have been known to like bombs, so does that mean all all Irish or all Catholics are the same or approve of these actions"
The thing you seem to have an issue with is that I am saying "muslims" - in the context of discussing how different groups react to abuse - "like to blow sh@t up".
So are you saying that I would be OK (or not) to say exactly the same thing but use the words "some muslims like to blow sh#t up"???
Or would that be considered a acist coment as well
I suspect you;ll take offence at that as well which brings me to my point.....
You and many others simply refuse to allow the propensity for "some" muslims to blow sh#t up (and threaten beheadings and overthrow of government and all sorts of mayhem and violence).....
....AS A CONSTRUCT...to be used in mainstream dialogue or debate.
The simple fact is that around the world the muslim religion - not some of it - the muslim religion - is responsible for virtually all of the mayhem, carnage and atrocities taking place
You would probably take some sort of offence at that - but it is simply stating the facts of the matter
So why is that? Why is that revelation when spoken in public such a threatening comment to you?
Again back to my quesion...
....are you OK with me adding the word "some" to my generalised comment about muslims????
