Feb 19th, page-134

This is really an interesting phenomenon.
I post doubts I have about a deal and back it up with research and logic. Where it was pointed out I was factually mistaken, I immediately agreed.
The rest was personal attacks, cheap psychological "analyses" and conspiration theories. The same reaction to a simple statement warning readers that infering sales from two order numbers is not necessarily right.
Yes, I defend myself against personal attacks and many times that forces me to explain my doubts again.
Logic dictates that if you do not believe in a stock, you won't hold it.
How can one make an informed decision, or hold a valuable discussion when only "believers" talk to each other and nay-sayers are chased away?
I hold many stocks and I value anyone's opinion. If the opinion is based on nonsense, I expect other holders to point out the errors, or give their reasoned own opinion.
I have learned that groupthink is a dangerous way of making decisions.
I would appreciate everyone to focus on the company and stop being scared of reading negative opinions.
In the mean time the VC deal still has not happened, so maybe you should not dismiss my opinion so easily.