AFR claim Big Un has links to $10m 'Ponzi' accountant, page-36

Typical article full of rubbish and insinuations backed by no hard facts. I could write an article on a lot of listed companies throwing a bit of shade here and there about someone's past and poke at certain ways a company conducts business to imply they could be in the wrong. This reporter is just a nobody who clearly couldn't make it as an analyst and has nothing better to do than report half a story here and there to cause a fuss. He could be onto something and we could all be wrong, however if I were him and my reputation and possible career was on the line (not to mention likely lawsuit if he is wrong) I would do the full digging and report facts not accusations. Let's just wait to see what the company has to say