"no dividend makes it less attractive"
But what if a company, instead of paying dividends, can invest in the business at supernormal rates of return, which increase the intrinsic value of the business?
Surely that makes such a business more attractive?
"note: i never posted on this forum to downramp the stock. i am not that interested in arguing. if my short is a dud, so be it"
No one is arguing; all that I am doing is conducting a discussion on the stock, by pointing out some aspects of CSL and its valuation which you have overlooked. (Just as I had overlooked them many years ago before someone kindly corrected me.).
Ann: Half Year Results Analyst Presentation, page-112
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 79 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CSL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$308.97 |
Change
0.410(0.13%) |
Mkt cap ! $149.0B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $307.48 | $309.29 | $306.25 | $78.74M | 255.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 85 | $308.91 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $309.00 | 1621 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.28pm 16/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CSL (ASX) Chart |