JS on Smart Investor (video interview), page-81

No amount of sensationalizing will bring a company down if the fundamental isn't true. The only fact is that Big Un is in a trading halt because they couldn't answer nor address issues exposed by Jonathan. There is also a blatant hypocrisy in your logic in that you yourself is acting like an attack dog utilizing sensationalism and post hoc fallacy in your arsenal. To what end? Simple, in hope to discredit Shapiro as much as possible (despite how pointless that actually is) to defend an alleged fraud so that you can safeguard your capital. Like a criminal lawyer with extreme partial motive defending a corrupt official.

All Jonathan wrote was a series of exposition articles based on investigative journalism and the proof is in the balance sheets. All of the logic he outlined stick like cement. Dig as much dirt as you like on Jonathan, his logic still sticks and there is nothing you can do about it. What is even more pathetic and disgusting is the fact that by your logic, if you are truly impartial, then you should be putting management and the company under the exact same scrutiny but you won't. Why? Because all you care about is your money, your capital, not facts nor truth.

You made a mistake, you didnt do your due diligence properly, learn from it. But obviously you won't and instead you blame Shapiro for your own mistake. Chances are he exposed one the biggest fraud in recent years and we should be congratulating him for it not attack him.