In talks with Volkswagen, Siemens, page-137

That's where you're mistaken. No one is here to persuade potential investors. This website and forum is not designed to persuade potential investors to do anything it's about sharing knowledge and providing a platform for a potential investor to make their own decision.

The MNS strategy is too difficult for many to comprehend, and that even goes for the holders. The commercial sensitivities around the battery cells, combined with all the agreements, the vertical integration strategy and developing battery IP make MNS one of the most opaque companies to invest in. However, if even just a small piece of this goes right significant value will be created for shareholders.

If we look at something as simple as the BMLMP battery cell and it's comparisons to other batteries, it can be considered on par or superior with current cells being produced. One thing that isn't factored in though is the anode containing 10% silicon which was subject to testing in 2016 and substantially increased the performance of the coin cells during testing. No one knows how all this IP and testing actually fits into the bigger scheme of things and people just have to wait.

You can sit here and spend your days going back and forth, but no one can actually establish a fool proof argument for or against the MNS strategy. The only barometer of success for the strategy at this stage is the market capitalisation of MNS as it reflects what the market values the company at. Right now MNS' value sits above the juniors like KNL, BKT, GPX and MUS. This gives a clear indication of the company the market wants to see succeed or expects to succeed.