Not only that, but the "10%" argument is being used to justify not having a clue what would happen to the wider economy if they did, and then implying from that lack of a clue, that indeed it would have such and such an outcome. Sorry, the whole argument is completely incoherent from start to finish.
- Forums
- Property
- Housing
Housing, page-42
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4,259 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)